Citizen Paine | Citizen Journalism

Blogger: London-CJ coverage misses the mark

Dana Blankenhorn writes that coverage of the London bombings-citizen journalism angle (see here and here) mischaracterizes citj:

The major media aren't paying for this stuff. ... (T)he key to success is a business model that includes the citizen-journalist, one that does not just take advantage of him. Papers that use free editorial help are making a devilish deal. They're assuming that the citizens are honest, and looking for work based on their honesty. ... You need some way to assure the readers that the game isn't rigged on the one hand, and some way to give contributors a stake in the game on the other hand.

He also notes that the quantity of citizen contributions can overwhelm readers, putting a premium on filters that point to the best stuff:

... (A)s camera phones proliferate, the volume of such pictures available is just going to become overwhelming. Making sense of what's out there, and getting rights to the good stuff, are going to be keys to success.

Nashville TV station trains amateur bloggers

When a news web site educates citizen journalists it has a two-fold benefit: The amateurs will improve their skills, and they're likely to think of submitting to the site that trained them when they create content worth publishing. So, kudos to WKRN-TV for the Video 101 session it conducted Saturday. (Link props to Buzz Machine.)

Brittney, posting on the Nashville is Talking blog, said:

The purpose was to give "citizen journalists" some tips on how to best shoot video for stories they want to tell. Whether it is your son's baseball game or a tornado or some sort of disaster. ... I learned a lot as they talked about how to steady your shots, how to take static pictures a viewer can comfortably watch.

Participant Rex Hammock wrote:

Here is what you should do if you want to get video on TV:
1. Hold the camera still.
2. Don't move the camera around.
3. Don't narrate the video with comments like, "this is a tornado hitting a cow."

More at timmorgan.com and Chasing the Dragon's Tale.

About 20 local bloggers signed up to participate, according to Terry Heaton, a WKRN consultant.

More:
Education and training
Video

Use of G8 protest pics stirs fair-use debate

J.D. Lasica points out a heated debate over whether a new KRON-TV blog overstepped the rules on fair use with its publication of photos of G8 protests in San Francisco, images that originated on Indymedia sites.

SF Indymedia and Indybay published the photos in several posts, including here and here. KRON's Brian Shields, doing real-time blogging during the anarchists' protests, posted some of those images on KRON's The Bay Area is Talking blog. Indymedia folks complained that the use of the photos on KRON's site violated copyright law.

Shields, in the post's comments section, defended his use of the photos under "the fair use exception to the copyright laws for breaking news coverage."

Terry Heaton, a blogger and consultant who helped launch the site, didn't address the legal issues but suggested that Shields and KRON were helping the Indymedia citizen journalists reach a mainstream audience with their message. "If, in fact, you are giving voice to those who wouldn't normally have a voice, why would you wish to limit that voice to a closed network?" he wrote in a comment on the KRON blog.

Lasica said he believes Shields' legal argument is "well-founded," and he chastised the Indymedia folks, saying, "But why in the world would Indy Media want to restrict the widespread online distribution of such a newsworthy set of photos? What rank hypocrisy."

Meanwhile, comments from posters indentified as "janky" and "k" took KRON to task for using the images without permission. Janky said:

I would ask that you take them all down and link to the individual articles where they were published. The copyright law for the SF Bay Area Indymedia site clearly states the obvious use limitations of content that is published on the site.

All the photos on this site were taken by people within the community and were posted on indybay.org for a reason. If you do not respect that, then at least leave comments for each individual to contact you for permission for use.

You cant just take photos willy nilly and repost them on a site that is for-profit without expressed permission. Either that, or I get to start making HD copies of Kron4 broadcasts and posting them everywhere on the net due to "fair use" laws.

You folks have paid reporters who make a living from this.

UPDATE: Discussion about fair use has continued in a separate thread on The Bay Area is Talking. Read the comment posted Sunday by Jackson West of sfist.com. He has the most thoughtful, well-reasoned approach so far of all the comments I've read in this thread and the one that started the debate.

More reaction to the London CJ angle

The citizen journalism angle continues to get significant coverage in the wake of the London bombings.

Washington Post: Witnesses to History

The London attacks moved the trend to a new level. Web sites from the BBC's to the Guardian's provided eyewitness accounts, some showing up as little as an hour or two after the first bomb went off. ... The tsunami prompted bloggers to post thousands of video entries and journal-style stories that circulated the Internet in a huge swarm of unedited data. London, (Dan Gillmor) said, showed how that data could be edited like traditional news and fill the gaps that the news could not.

Poynter Online: E-Media Tidbits: Mass Audience for London News by the Masses

One of the first eyewitness pictures was sent by Adam Stacey via his camera phone to Alfie Dennen, the owner of Alfie's Discotastic Moblog and was from there quickly picked up by TV channel Sky, which credited it as "a passenger's camera photo." It was also picked up by the BBC, which added the careful caveat, "This photo by Adam Stacey is available on the Internet and claims to show people trapped on the underground system."

LA Times: Cellphones Change the View of Disaster

Shortly after bombs ripped through London's transportation system Thursday morning, U.S. and British television networks began airing the first footage of the aftermath — dim images of shaken commuters streaming through a smoky underground tunnel. ... "It's a harbinger of what's to come in terms of citizen journalism," said Jon Klein, president of CNN/U.S. "These days, you just have to be in the wrong place at the right time, and you too can cover the news." ... But the increasing availability of the footage will also raise the need for stringent standards about what gets on the air, news executives noted. In London, video technicians studied the footage to ensure it was authentic, according to Justine Bower, a spokeswoman for Sky News.

New York Times: Witnesses Post Instant Photos on the Web

Online photo-sharing sites and Web blogs began chronicling the attacks soon after they occurred, posting material often gathered before professional news organizations arrived on the scenes. ... Tim Bradshaw, who posted photos from around London on flickr.com, said in an e-mail message he was not sure at first whether he would post them. "It seemed kind of wrong," Mr. Bradshaw wrote. "The BBC and other news Web sites were so overwhelmed it was almost like an alternative source of news. "I think it's really interesting how many camera-phone pictures made it onto the national news."

Making a move

Starting Monday, I will be the editor for online news and citizen media for the Contra Costa Times. It's a new position, and I'm very excited about this opportunity.

It's a return to where I spent the '90s as a reporter, assistant metro editor, county bureau chief and, finally, online editor. The title shows how things have changed since I left Contra Costa in 2000 to help start GetLocalNews.com.

I won't say much more here about the new gig. You'll have to check in periodically at ContraCostaTimes.com to see what we're up to.

For GetLocalNews, I wish only the best. It was a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to help conceive and build a citizen journalism network before we even knew to call it that.

The future of this blog? Don't know yet.

Reaction to citizen journalism in London

Discussion from around the Web about the London bombings and citizen journalism.

Ponderance: The Mediascape & The London Bombings

Just as the Tsunami disaster last year illustrated the significant impact and utility of citizen journalism, the tragic London Bombings have highlighted collaborative grassroots media reporting. The Wikipedia entries on the London Bombings and the Responses to the Bombing are among the most detailed and reliable sources on the tragedy and its immediate aftermath, updated collaboratively and regularly.

UndergroundMedia.org: London Attacks Show Citizen Media In Action

The sad events in London today also shed light on the power of the average citizen to take an active roll in media events.

RatcliffeBlog: I heard the news today, oh boy ...

(L)et's look at the notion that the "citizen journalism" is "covering" this event. If you check the "bomb" group on Flickr, there are pictures of London, but the majority are photos of television screens and screen captures of Web sites reporting on the attacks this morning. ... People express their shock, their anger, their sense that vengeance is called for, but they are not "reporting" facts about the events in any sense. They are reflecting and amplifying the facts, adding a human dimension, but I challenge the statement that any of this is journalism.

B.L. Ochman: Citizen Journalists Provide First-Hand Accounts of London Terror Attacks

The real value of blogging, podcasting and other citizen media is evident today, as London reels from the cowardly attacks by terrorists on ordinary citizens.

Wall Street Journal: Bloggers and Photographers Chronicle Chaos in London

As journalists scrambled to cover the London bomb blasts, ordinary citizens went online to share pictures snapped by cameraphones and reports of what they saw. At Technorati.com, a search engine for blogs, eight of the top 10 searches Thursday were related to the blasts.

'Dog Poop Girl' story hits the fan

The "Dog Poop Girl" story, the talk of blogs for several weeks as an example of how citizen journalists and the internet are changing the rules on privacy, hit the Washington Post on Thursday with a piece titled "Subway Fracas Escalates Into Test Of the Internet's Power to Shame."

This article -- about the girl on the South Korea subway whose photo was plastered online after she refused to clean up after her pooch -- says:

In discussions with dozens of people about this story, and in reading comments on blogs, I found an intriguing common thread. The instinct of most was to accept using the Internet as a new social-enforcement tool, but to search for that point on the continuum where enough was too much.

Putting Dog Poop Girl's picture on the Web was OK, some said, but not the clamoring for more information that followed. Others said the woman's face and other identifying features should have been obscured more. Still others said she was entitled to no privacy at all.

Columbia Journalism Review also joined in with "The Tale of Dog Poop Girl Is Not So Funny After All."

Where do you start? Where do you end?

Today, as events unfold in London, I'm drawn to the eyewitness accounts, such as these comments on the BBC and Guardian web sites and this BBC collection of reader-submitted photos. Yet, in this age of self-publishing, that's a miniscule fraction of what's being published. Thousands of citizen journalist posts and images are showing up on Technorati, Flickr and other aggregators. Finding the best is a challenge.

For blogs, I've been looking at "london"-tagged posts at Technorati and at the UKBlogs Aggregator. For images, try "london"-tagged posts at Flickr. Flickr also has two-relevant photo pools: The London Bomb Blasts Pool and London Explosions Pool.

Something innate compels me to wade through dozens of posts and photos, yet there's just too much here. Neither Technorati nor Flickr call for the user to evaluate content, so we can't help guide one another to the best material.

Over at moblog UK, users to rate photos. But on a breaking story, that's not much help because the highest-rated photos are older ones. There's no mechanism for promoting the best of the most-recent images.

So, we rely on the individual human filters:
Boing Boing, which led me to the Flickr pools.
Project Nothing!
Wikipedia
Tim Worstall
Europhobia
Buzz Machine

Vlogs as CJ and tool for politicos

AlterNet has a good piece on videoblogs, discussing their potential for citizen journalism and for local political candidates.

About campaigns, the article, by Zack Pelta-Heller, says:

Two local politicians who have recently started vlogging are Boston city councilor John Tobin and New York resident Andrew Rasiej, who is running for Public Advocate in New York City. Even if you have no idea who either candidate is, their vlogs will provide voters with a fast, effective way to engage in the political process. Watching Rasiej head down to New York's city hall on the subway to speak out at a city council hearing for the city to receive a wireless internet connection is far more compelling than simply reading a summary of the hearing's minutes.

The article also quotes Senator John Edwards, who launched a vlog last month, touting it as a way to get around the filters of mainstream media:

Sen. Edwards is well aware of the impact that vlogs could have on the future of politics and journalism, commenting: "I think [vlogging] will be hugely important because it's a way to directly talk to people without someone else editing what you say or taking it out of context. ..."

Scoopt: Our target is the guy with the cameraphone

Scoopt's Kyle MacRae responds via email to my post this week about the new service, which offers to sell your photos or videos to a publisher for a 50-50 split and a six-month exclusive license.

Here are Kyle's comments:

With reference to the initial Scoopt six-month exclusive license, you said:

That's quite a commitment to make to a new player, and I'm not sure many citizen journalists will go for it. I suppose if you're a prolific photographer, you might take a chance on Scoopt. If they do good by you, then that six-month term might not seem so stiff.

I think it's important that we draw a clear distinction here between professional photographers, aspiring professional photographers -- and somebody with a cameraphone who just happens to be in the right place at the right time and snaps a newsworthy event. Scoopt was set up specifically and exclusively to represent this last group.

My contention is that the true amateur doesn't know or care about photographic licensing -- and, further, nor should they care. Scoopt is not for people making a living or seeking to make a living from photography; Scoopt is for somebody who realises that one day he just might take a great picture and could get some money for it. The true amateur with a cameraphone doesn't want to phone a picture desk editor and haggle or auction a photo.

Indeed, the true amateur probably doesn't know what a picture desk editor is, or how to approach one. But he does know that newspapers and magazines buy pictures if the picture is strong enough. Scoopt helps him make that sale.

Scoopt also protects the rights of our members. What happens when an amateur with a hot photo phones up a newspaper? Chances are he'll (unwittingly) sign away universal rights in exchange for the price of a hot dinner. The paper will then sub-license the photo around the world and the photographer will receive not a further penny. But with Scoopt, the photographer always retains copyright. We will license the photo for publication on his behalf, potentially time and time again -- and the photographer will ALWAYS get 50% of the fee.

We need an exclusive license for the reasons given, and which you quoted.

Basically, we must be able to guarantee to a publisher that we can deliver what we promise -- for instance, a one-day-only exclusive right to publish a photo on the front page. The easiest approach for us would undoubtedly be to demand assignation of copyright from our members. In other words, when a member submits a photo, we would automatically own that photo and could do whatever we want with it. (This is what our lawyers advised!) However, we simply feel that this is unfair on the photographer. It is, we believe, right and proper that even a complete amateur with no interest in or knowledge of copyright and licensing should retain copyright to his own works, always. The six-month exclusive license is a compromise that gives us the security we need to trade on his behalf without stripping the photographer of his rights.

In summary, if Scoopt was a traditional photo agency pitching to traditional pro or pro-am photographers trying to make a living from photography, I'd agree with you and we'd offer a range of (complicated) licensing agreements.

But Scoopt is different. We represent the true amateur who gets a scoop snap of a newsworthy event and wants a) the best possible price and b) an easy life.